IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Additional Last Call: RFC-to-be 6478, previously draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10.txt (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 17 April 2012 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0539B21F8670; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57a7l++ilyzi; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B921F866D; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; l=1967; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1334662238; x=1335871838; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JY/b5ebLVlTQK83IPc0NnZLmozyQsBsnJM8cYuR1FeU=; b=II/z32zfwRDlqxAwj46LH27UCAwfhvn6+WzhzVw5resgSIfN79ciRLRq v6RftAm0CcMFJW07uTo3P3bKoTlzlSulhQzQ8cjGj9Yea8ewI4z6jLdNL ZgfFmSybdXbrCF43SVhkhxiY0+BMScvEqPEiT8E4EBcY4ICbS+riLQCj8 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADxTjU+Q/khM/2dsb2JhbABEsS2BB4IJAQEBBBIBAiM2CgEQCxgJFgQLCQMCAQIBNBETAQUCAQEeh2wLmWyDPxCcSo1TgyQElW+BEY08gQJngmiBWw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,433,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="71063443"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2012 11:30:36 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3HBUaGW029249; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:30:36 GMT
Received: from stbryant-mac2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id q3HBUWaZ027712; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:30:34 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4F8D5458.2000700@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:30:32 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20120416163350.4446.64763.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120416163350.4446.64763.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Additional Last Call: RFC-to-be 6478, previously draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10.txt (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:31:03 -0000

To clarify

The text that needs to be reviewed is the text in the RFC editor's queue

http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6478.txt

Note that the URL for the text in the RFC Editor's queue, provided
in the original email, contains a spurious trailing space.

Stewart

On 16/04/2012 17:33, The IESG wrote:
> Due to technical changes made during AUTH48, the IESG is issuing an
> additional Last Call on the following document:
>
> - 'Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires'
>    <draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-04-30. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document specifies a mechanism to signal Pseudowire (PW) status
>     messages using an PW associated channel (ACh). Such a mechanism is
>     suitable for use where no PW dynamic control plane exits, known as
>     static PWs, or where a Terminating Provider Edge (T-PE) needs to send
>     a PW status message directly to a far end T-PE. The mechanism allows
>     PW OAM message mapping and PW redundancy to operate on static PWs.
>     This document also updates rfc5885 in the case when Bi-directional
>     Forwarding Detection (BFD) is used to convey PW status signaling
>     information.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6478.txt/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status