[PWE3] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: Tofoo -- Discussion list for Tunneling over Foo (with)in IP networks (TOFOO)

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 10 April 2014 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1D81A03DE for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUbs1XRr7xhz for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31921A03CE for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q108so4422237qgd.38 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=KUVqTE/9mw2rYowleT3nK9b6qWBInUcSStzliWlgFPw=; b=QYPFo1+MSAzskWk4kdDaKA/QbKf/ujHTjK21/XtQV9zDp72NvvXPI+GR7H5wRS0pN2 VwnWEg7KQAq9/L4pINpiYIKLeLCR6OB4/UNJh09K2hQwexYLovsX1We2O31YklZrIhn+ m+ib+PCu7Tvh1NsQ8HCnLpJSzjI+HS0NIdHpvWSUoRn96J3B2dPeNoiYYFMtBqhn1OeR tDt7GPBlDPzFCe6UjVKG3ykDv6zI3uEkk5xO3wNPkTAwjeTvBxEkRKjqjrJ+TwVx/RTB VeK/aha0OO94cv3PsEPTfGw1CqBXyMQiJScU+xl58JHLcEBtFMkvXVPGLREoyByENnH4 DbBQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.108.166 with SMTP id j35mr1933349qgf.76.1397160376407; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.205.69 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140410170359.12268.41197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20140410170359.12268.41197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:05:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU15AmjRD4VOC6c2sEzbau9Fh8QVDD6b7-=O_p0qk7LPEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a6ddaee1c7a04f6b5bfc7
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/BIHevflEZREDvtU2rLqmdsppQI8
Subject: [PWE3] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: Tofoo -- Discussion list for Tunneling over Foo (with)in IP networks (TOFOO)
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:06:19 -0000

There's no explicit indication that MPLS tunnels and/or pseudowires will be
included in this list, but you might want to subscribe just in case.

Cheers,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:03 PM
Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: Tofoo -- Discussion list for Tunneling
over Foo (with)in IP networks (TOFOO)
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mls.ietf@gmail.com, tofoo@ietf.org


A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.

List address: tofoo@ietf.org
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tofoo/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tofoo

Purpose:

Tunneling data across IP-based networks can use a variety of existing
encapsulation schemes, such as, GRE [RFC2784], IP-in-IP [RFC2003] and IPsec
tunnels [RFC4301] or proposed encapsulation schemes that are based on
carrying traffic over UDP.
The demand for using tunnels in data centers and across the Internet is
increasing also due to network virtualization.
A number of known issues have been raised around using tunnels, discussions
about applicability of these issues are ongoing and a number of solutions
to cope with, for instance, congestion control or congestion control
sensitivity, are being discussed.
The intention of this list is to bring together tunnel protocol
designers/implementers, network operators, and the different areas in the
IETF to discuss the ways forward.

For additional information, please contact the list administrators.