Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
Lizhong Jin<lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn> Wed, 29 August 2012 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6900521F8624 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.599, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ej4BfC2lQoC for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149521F8491 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.119] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 232551397396305; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:51:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse02.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.21]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 87D6477FDC0; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:54:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q7TAwAcY064485; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:58:10 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.60.1346007617.23722.pwe3@ietf.org>
To: pwe3@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF8DCC963B.4B7EC0D4-ON48257A69.003B537D-48257A69.003C4203@zte.com.cn>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:57:29 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-08-29 18:58:09, Serialize complete at 2012-08-29 18:58:09
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003C420348257A69_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q7TAwAcY064485
Cc: yaakov_s@rad.com
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:58:19 -0000
I prefer option C, to have a quick doc first. Lizhong > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:00:20 +0000 > From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> > To: "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org> > Cc: "pwe3 \(pwe3@ietf.org\)" <pwe3@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 > Message-ID: > <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90455CBFA@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > PWE chairs, > > At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update document, > or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired. > > Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a "tutorial". > > To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the > minutes) an underwhelming response. > My own email to the list elicited only three responses. > > Could you ask for people to express their opinions ? > (A - quick doc B - full doc C - A and then possibly B later on) > > (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave > A, and Mach C in favor of B. > I personally like C too.). > > Y(J)S > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail- > archive/web/pwe3/attachments/20120826/72bad3df/attachment.htm> > > ------------------------------ >
- [PWE3] VCCV2 Yaakov Stein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Yaakov Stein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 David Allan I
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Mach Chen
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Yaakov Stein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Sam Aldrin
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Lizhong Jin
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Malis, Andrew G (Andy)
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Malis, Andrew G (Andy)
- Re: [PWE3] VCCV2 Gregory Mirsky