Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Lizhong Jin<lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn> Wed, 29 August 2012 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6900521F8624 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.599, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ej4BfC2lQoC for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149521F8491 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.119] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 232551397396305; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:51:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse02.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.21]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 87D6477FDC0; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:54:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q7TAwAcY064485; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:58:10 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.60.1346007617.23722.pwe3@ietf.org>
To: pwe3@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF8DCC963B.4B7EC0D4-ON48257A69.003B537D-48257A69.003C4203@zte.com.cn>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:57:29 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-08-29 18:58:09, Serialize complete at 2012-08-29 18:58:09
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003C420348257A69_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q7TAwAcY064485
Cc: yaakov_s@rad.com
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:58:19 -0000

I prefer option C, to have a quick doc first.

Lizhong


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:00:20 +0000
> From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
> To: "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
> Cc: "pwe3 \(pwe3@ietf.org\)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
> Message-ID:
>    <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90455CBFA@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> PWE chairs,
> 
> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update 
document,
> or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
> 
> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a 
"tutorial".
> 
> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the 
> minutes) an underwhelming response.
> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
> 
> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
> (A - quick doc   B - full doc   C - A and then possibly B later on)
> 
> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave 
> A, and Mach C in favor of B.
>  I personally like C too.).
> 
> Y(J)S
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/pwe3/attachments/20120826/72bad3df/attachment.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
>