Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <amalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2F521F861D for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZryLYUcrx86v for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8464A21F861C for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so4555608ghb.31 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=J5gyJiizNzSkYrbNwn1RtCLVis5KOZ9T8E4tn9BZkj4=; b=XkALMHQhFHcwO8uX+AYEz/pKFECcuRtr06mMAolT4aBmg/965zjibU1i/Ek/2yn+bi wr1if+R66I6JTlclrO2xNp1+ckr3hS70WV19nry36zAQE0EzQzFrtjM6vl6dCxUQHfQK hpXvbnuS8dUuSJ3R5nIWmN7dNSG/ARIf79xmh1k1zZmkTpiOsM54BqPw8aF1i1oD3Kkm FfiXAbToiOHHWvsuyZ6CeFiiRbTzlJVl7Zo8CK3Fd/lMjNr+T2/w1dd+1/f97YsN8xvw /OoMJx8WTIeHqPoSdqkBvjgYVe5oHhN3mbccFmLTe0xTrakQSrtLCBhsZH7jRsmh4HVa knSg==
Received: by 10.60.6.167 with SMTP id c7mr4130129oea.88.1345219118740; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.96.177 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK+d4xuwFNi=AeSEQGV62B6uUxtbWadca=yn=qNF1LfQHghQPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK+d4xuwFNi=AeSEQGV62B6uUxtbWadca=yn=qNF1LfQHghQPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:58:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAK+d4xtfdard8q7sOoznri8SDLOGmpPN=-wNX5og3XSEedNvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:59:52 -0000

This ends the WG adoption poll for draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf -
we have a new working group draft. Authors, please submit
draft-ietf-pwe3-congcons-00.pdf and .txt.

Thanks,
Andy

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Andrew G. Malis <amalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the support shown both in this week's meeting and on the list,
> and that this has been a long-standing item on the PWE3 WG charter,
> the chairs would like to poll the WG for the adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf as a
> working group draft. Please reply to this email whether or not you
> support adoption of this draft. Reasons are not required, but are
> helpful for the WG. If you've already shown support on the list for
> the draft, that support has been noted and does not need to be
> repeated.
>
> (Note that we refer to the pdf version of this draft rather than the
> text version, as the pdf version contains non-ASCII figures that are
> not visible in the text version.)
>
> Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for
> more details).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
> draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each
> author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author
> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware
> of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF
> rules.
>
> This will be a two-week poll, ending 17 August.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy and Matthew