Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Dear Andy, et al.,
I would like to confirm my earlier expressed support for 5085bis/Option B.

	Regards,
		Greg 

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 10:32 AM
To: Yaakov Stein
Cc: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org) pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Working group,

Could you please respond to Yaakov's email, stating your preference?
We'll keep this open for the following week and make a choice next weekend.

Thanks,
Andy

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> wrote:
> PWE chairs,
>
>
>
> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update 
> document,
>
> or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>
>
>
> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a 
> "tutorial".
>
>
>
> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes) 
> an underwhelming response.
>
> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>
>
>
> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>
> (A - quick doc   B - full doc   C - A and then possibly B later on)
>
>
>
> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A, 
> and Mach C in favor of B.
>
>  I personally like C too.).
>
>
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3