Re: [PWE3] Updates to goals and milestones

Thomas D Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 08 May 2012 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA1B21F84F3 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 04:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kaxFJkezrDlr for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 04:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3C21F84F8 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 04:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5709E210285D; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at www.lucidvision.com
Received: from lucidvision.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (static-72-71-250-34.cncdnh.fios.verizon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NibDXI5ZJTiQ; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.58] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CD72102850; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
References: <CBCE99C0.2A66D%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CBCE99C0.2A66D%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-C75CDB7E-9A92-40AB-B444-390BD15151EC"
Message-Id: <0B1336EA-4B70-4F0D-AAA5-5C1EC63335F3@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B176)
From: Thomas D Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:50:06 -0400
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: "Carlos Pignataro(cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Updates to goals and milestones
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 11:50:09 -0000

Agreed.



On May 8, 2012, at 6:19 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Greg, Carlos,
> 
> I think this milestone started life as referring to any PW OAM extensions required for MPLS-TP. However, it has become very ambiguous. There are really a number of objectives that we should capture, including at least the following:
> 
> Additional VCCV Channel Type using the GAL
> VCCV capability negotiation for MPLS-TP OAM tools.
> Rationalisation of VCCV (RFC5085bis)
> 
> I think we could replace this milestone with milestones for the above.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Matthew
> 
> On 04/05/2012 20:53, "Gregory Mirsky" <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Matthew, Carlos, et al.,
> I agree with Carlos that updates to VCCV Control Channels resulting from discussion of GAL as Type 4 VCCV CC, perhaps as RFC5085bis, can be captured in Milestones. But I think that this work not necessarily tied with CV capability extension that, I think, referenced as "Enhanced PW OAM".
>  
>     Regards,
>         Greg
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 4:38 AM
> To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Updates to goals and milestones
> 
> Matthew,
> 
> In Paris there was discussion (and subsequent followup) about a VCCV-bis document. I am not sure if a formal consensus call was issued on that, but I wonder if it needs to be captured as a milestone (or how it relates to "Enhanced PW OAM"). 
> 
> Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
> Excuze typofraphicak errows
> 
> On May 4, 2012, at 6:39 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Please find below a proposed list of updates to the WG goals and milestones that was presented in Paris, with one modification pushing the P2MP Requirements LC back to Dec 2012.
>> 
>> Please post any comments to the list before Friday 11th May.
>> 
>> Matthew
>> 
>>  Done     - PWE3 WG started, organize editing teams.
>>   Done     - Hold interim meeting, including discussion of priority of service-specific documents and consider pruning some deliverables
>>   Done     - Accept drafts of service-specific documents as WG items
>>   Done     - PW Requirements Document Last Call
>>   Done     - TDM Circuit Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - ATM Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - Ethernet Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - Fragmentation LC
>>   Done     - TDM Requirements LC
>>   Done     - SONET Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - TDM Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - Frame Relay Documents Last Call
>>   Done     - FCS retention Last Call
>>   Done     - Multi-Segment PW Requirements LC
>>   Done     - VCCV LC
>>   Done     - PWE3 Services MIBs LC
>>   Done     - PPP/HDLC PW LC
>>   Done     - Wildcard FEC LC
>>   Done     - TDM Signaling LC
>>   Done- Multi-Segment Architecture LC
>>   Done     - Basic Pseudowire MIBs LC
>>   Done - PW OAM Mapping LC
>>   Done - Multi-Segment PW LC
>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration Requirements LC
>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration Architecture
>>   Done - Generic Associated Channel Header LC
>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration LC
>>   Done - Fiber Channel Encap LC
>>   Done- Multipath PW LC
>>   Done  - Packet PW Requirements / solution
>>   Dec  2012- P2MP Requirements LC
>>   Done  – PW Status signalling in static/MPLS-TP
>>   July 2012 - Dynamic MS PW LC
>>   Sept 2012- Enhanced PW OAM
>>   Sept 2011 – Signaling extensions for MPLS-TP OAM
>>   Dec 2012- Multisegment PW MIB
>>   Dec 2012- Security Considerations LC
>>   Dec 2012– Congestion Considerations 
>>  Dec  2012- P2MP PW Signaling (root initiated)
>>  Dec 2012– P2MP PW Signaling (leaf initiated)
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3