IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

"Shahram Davari" <davari@broadcom.com> Mon, 27 August 2012 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2059021F84DA for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.145
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.453, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ft6IchIxnggH for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mms1.broadcom.com (mms1.broadcom.com [216.31.210.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1950421F84CE for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:02:02 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 06151B78-6688-425E-9DE2-57CB27892261
Received: from SJEXCHCAS02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.37) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.247.2; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:02:55 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::bc15:c1e1:c29a:36f7]) by sjexchcas02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:02:35 -0700
From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: VCCV2
Thread-Index: Ac1wCmL5ehLaaQv+TH2ez80Jt0Yk9wABVMjwAACTS1AAABFWUAAAIQJQAAUM3lIE1oyFEAA/MNIA
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:02:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F28085AB9@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C68D@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8C8@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se> <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C813@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8DB@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>, <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5667D23392@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE22CA335DF@SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com> <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90455CBFA@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90455CBFA@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.240.251.52]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 7C2569903MK25042298-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F28085AB9SJEXCHMB12corpadb_"
Cc: "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:03:11 -0000

Hi Yaakov,

I prefer C, since people are developing products and C is the fastest way to guide the industry.

Thanks
Shahram

From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yaakov Stein
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 5:00 AM
To: pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

PWE chairs,

At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update document,
or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.

Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a "tutorial".

To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes) an underwhelming response.
My own email to the list elicited only three responses.

Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
(A - quick doc   B - full doc   C - A and then possibly B later on)

(I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A, and Mach C in favor of B.
 I personally like C too.).

Y(J)S

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status