IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Is there any IPR on draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?

"Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1421F859A; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ob+ureDs5jiG; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBC821F8599; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q44HsQxm001733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 May 2012 12:54:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.112]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q44HsQZc009530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 May 2012 12:54:26 -0500
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.144]) by USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.112]) with mapi; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:54:26 -0500
From: "Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 12:54:25 -0500
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Is there any IPR on draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?
Thread-Index: Ac0pYPIgBMzM+v5kRLO6eMpcAlEarQAArRHAAC7N8bA=
Message-ID: <2073A6C5467C99478898544C6EBA3F4602C1529678@USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4FA2D904.5040007@cisco.com> <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50BD712FB8A@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50BD712FB8A@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Cc: pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Is there any IPR on draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:54:34 -0000

 
Hi Stewart,
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

-Praveen  

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:14 PM
To: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pwe3; pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] Is there any IPR on draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?


This document was on the IESG Telechat for 10 May 2012.

However it has been drawn to my attention that because of the length of time taken to address comments the proto statement was written before we required the shepherd to asked each author to confirmed that they know of no IPR related to this draft.

I have postponed the IESG review by two weeks so that, we can check whether there is IPR on the document that needs to be disclosed.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the the draft?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Regards

Stewart

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status