Re: [PWE3] Is there any IPR on draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?

None from my end.

On May 3, 2012:3:14 PM, at 3:14 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:

> 
> This document was on the IESG Telechat for 10 May 2012.
> 
> However it has been drawn to my attention that because of
> the length of time taken to address comments the proto
> statement was written before we required the shepherd
> to asked each author to confirmed that they know of no IPR
> related to this draft.
> 
> I have postponed the IESG review by two weeks so that, we
> can check whether there is IPR on the document that needs to
> be disclosed.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the the draft?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to
> the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as
> an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if
> you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
> conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Stewart
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 