Re: [PWE3] PWE3 congestion considerations draft

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6EB11E80F2 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UyxrzH-YyuWe for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta4.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta4.messagelabs.com [85.158.143.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739C11E80A3 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.143.35:52916] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 0D/3F-17938-96789105; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:45:45 +0000
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1343850345!16384777!1
X-Originating-IP: [168.87.1.157]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.6.1.2; banners=-,-,-
Received: (qmail 7686 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2012 19:45:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fridlpvsb005.ecitele.com) (168.87.1.157) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2012 19:45:45 -0000
X-AuditID: a8571406-b7f176d000000aff-6b-5019877757e5
Received: from FRIDWPPCH002.ecitele.com (Unknown_Domain [10.1.16.53]) by fridlpvsb005.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E3.B3.02815.77789105; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:45:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from FRIDWPPMB002.ecitele.com ([169.254.4.204]) by FRIDWPPCH002.ecitele.com ([10.1.16.53]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:45:44 +0200
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
Thread-Topic: PWE3 congestion considerations draft
Thread-Index: Ac1wC0Lk12U8pzIEQfqeRMaM7W8oDwAEjwDq
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA020C3C18@FRIDWPPMB002.ecitele.com>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C6C6@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C6C6@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.1.2]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA020C3C18FRIDWPPMB002ecite_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA3VTWUzUUBTltaUUpKYO48ybkYRaJn6og4MrGgb1Q+MSIxGMiT9ap4+Z6kyn thUBE4MRNaISnIALRkQzKsE1uCcukbgOMeISt4hxISYuicTEKB+Cr1SQH//OO+fec0/77mNI 2w/azciKgTRFDAt0GpUGktze9dtchb6+x6Pyar6fp/K6q38lzyLmxeM9xLzYqZJCYnklyBcV JWqIBuIlpAf8QqEml4qBcoGXJb+QK/BqWAygCFIMvyCqKlIkoSAtH5OywiMlEJVkJegX5hct 9ublTZnuzRUKikOyziNvRJTDfATpuhhEPGbMaIqEJL4kqvFGCPEaCsiqjFbuIkM1x+to9fDo sr7bnVQliGVWA4aB3GTY+3p0NUjF0AE73pyhq0EaY+MSAG6pvwKsQxzAgz9u0GYVzflh64nO fmznsuHX7b3JJia5sbD9QX0/n8Hlws1Ve0mrZiI8cK2dHsA91w+Q5mCK88CuzskmZLlFMNYx zaywcQvgqc7WfsdUbiG8takKmBjgbD8TJwlrkhO+6jpEWJk5GL/6kLTwSPjpg5UGclnw3IUP f5NF4e2GlykmZrkR8P7+LsqqccGbzS+oWuBoGGLbMKSlYUiLxefAF/V1tIXHwWOHv5AW9sJ9 vW3UUL4JpLQAWKLJUlgt1Vf5fFNy8FUYKIxyAtFIK8C707zMTl8GlbU5bYBjgJDOgjJXoS1Z LNXLI23AxRDCSDa2EVPDV0Wl8pCoh1Zo68JIbwOQIQU7+2UD1lhJLK9AWnRAmoN/7W7SPSwQ NVfBWDHJ5/v/QXCyZ5YULLZxQbyaaxBSkTbgk8kwAmTbt+IRIzQURGUlctj4JxNMqhkjHcfY adawuipGdDlo6QngcjvZs6bAmUJonTLY+xk48cdmsHdMNR0v7GDXZ2xIYMPiWQ7TED+XQcld CSZsmZs0tyLL8fru0otzyOaEfYZ7f6Nnh+HJPk1+419Wrd351DPsXYI4kvRwdXx+zfjftfb2 HuP70aI9TY+eZE+948ncfSzlQve1jEvLn9/TThSxzivPbC2Bt0eM2Ps9+aHMno6JH7McfXXd C1pXU88a1TH3P1Z8mnm9a+3s3lEtxXsbBUoPibljSU0X/wC3XPc5CAQAAA==
Cc: "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 congestion considerations draft
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:45:49 -0000

Yaakov and all,

I've read the draft, and it looks OK to me. It explains - at last - while congestion is not a real issue with PWs - something that most of us have probably known for as long as the term PW has been coined, but failed to present this point clearly and convincingly.



Understanding that a PW is NOT, congestion-wise, similar to a single TCP or UDP flow closes an old outstanding gap.



I support adoption of this draft as a WG item.



My 2c,

     Sasha

________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Yaakov Stein [yaakov_s@rad.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:29 PM
To: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: [PWE3] PWE3 congestion considerations draft

Hi all

This is an email to solicit comments on http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf .

The authors would like this to become a WG draft, to fulfill our long-standing commitment to treat PWE congestion issues.

Y(J)S

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.