[PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00
"Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 14:54 UTC
Return-Path: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E981A0021
for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LO1xFx3N8wJ2 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 9 May 2014 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F22B1A0008
for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com
[135.239.2.122])
by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s49Es3gj019294
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 09:54:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com
(fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74])
by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s49Es34M030810
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL)
for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:54:03 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.139]) by
FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id
14.02.0247.003; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:54:03 +0200
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll and implementation check for
draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00
Thread-Index: AQHPa5aEFC0CBWFNUk+iJZ9q/dQH7A==
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:54:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CF92AA98.62C1A%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CF92AA9862C1Amatthewboccialcatellucentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/N9xiQBPnYCav0BY5zC3PzjXmJx8
Subject: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for
draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>,
<mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>,
<mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:54:12 -0000
This is an IPR and implementation poll for http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00, which is currently in WG last call. Are you aware of any further IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? Note that there are currently two IPR disclosures in the IETF datatracker. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PWE3 WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF Rules. In addition, the IESG routinely asks for implementation information on a draft it is reviewing for publication. If you are aware of any implementations of this draft (yours or others), please let me know. You may respond to the list, or just to me if you prefer. If you wish for any information to remain confidential, let me know and I'll anonymize it in the document's IESG writeup. Matthew and Andy
- [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for draf… Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
- Re: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for … Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for … Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
- Re: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for … Yimin Shen
- Re: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for … Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [PWE3] IPR poll and implementation check for … Rahul Aggarwal