Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible?
davarish@yahoo.com Sat, 18 June 2011 20:50 UTC
Return-Path: <davarish@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D2611E81FE for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xx3LfRzOkMBJ for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp108-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (smtp108-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.185.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1847211E81F8 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11300 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2011 20:43:27 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=qlDhpurPR/97BMNMREEYkqYpnI4xhEiWpK75HFvcyXU5P3lYLyJAhzpmNClj8cJ028CwBfePdC02z7zlcu96vrzEMlXg6GN7k6WYNl7sc2bSqXn+tYwj6rwHtXT3pid5OB/16486yA9xfIQAA+calFwYrEvxGsyYm+8YehHLgC4= ;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308429807; bh=FNW2hzhUrGk3VCubm2OyMzjvSeQ/PyWd99JMw67MU+A=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=KvYnaZFslfSJ+dCcjhCc7yx89h364uEmrD2ojAPv9g1ttyJjMg5Dx6zY9Ifm95wlKWlEYEcy3pziUm0WQik1MbO7O7h9rYFpcdJFz8tzLk4/FaqlXNaovf7knSRFtAvDPAJwTTIvY58n8b1+fTqzT3lwy5qCtewRLrXXPyVAVtE=
Received: from b15.c27.bise6.blackberry (davarish@74.82.86.201 with xymcookie) by smtp108-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2011 13:43:26 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ygPrP9CswBCWPbPtKJlJyLY0KMlg
X-YMail-OSG: 3c0T3lcVM1k0I263SuqJMGafKQexPnfdKxcPudqKk2SglfE wywmlrAmrTNmh_.UqnJoIAgOJFW80OURxlEJYkn2BLSSXiSkMe289HYELxNt G8vNZrfHPlsnK2TVO3avmriU0yZSvwktf0_R4obj9bjp7z7eBV9ahmuBecH4 tjqZ4k74DbfAcwqr6vIRBVC0FJ9Moow2kgJat.4A4eha7fCWe9CiGm6otxqF RDVpUnxDMgTS8uZ9_wUcUOdFIe2ItziaYMuPoQhpah7u.oRf5LZCuymaTWro Ns2SvwyRh7P0EcMJtC0fhmL1Seo2Nf6ipp9rZ2orSOTlNJzIgah4vBmvuQBb a_mNgoBYSbfiVIV.G_3_U52ONCGaL03fxoktr7anC
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 1398490709
Message-ID: <1398490709-1308429804-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-749160581-@b4.c27.bise6.blackberry>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: Normal
References: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C97E@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>, <BANLkTim=0LAmsft=JnqFQYODfa17nfirDg@mail.gmail.com><A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C97F@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C97F@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
Sensitivity: Normal
Importance: Normal
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>, mpls-bounces@ietf.org, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
From: davarish@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:43:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:49:13 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Vladimir Kleiner <Vladimir.Kleiner@ecitele.com>, Mishael Wexler <Mishael.Wexler@ecitele.com>, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, Oren Gal <Oren.Gal@ecitele.com>, John Shirron <John.Shirron@ecitele.com>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible?
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: davarish@yahoo.com
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:50:10 -0000
Sasha All traffic except LSP OAM traffic from protection LSP must be discarded in Rx. So what is the issue? Thx Shahram Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:58:41 To: Greg Mirsky<gregimirsky@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mpls@ietf.org>; Vladimir Kleiner<Vladimir.Kleiner@ecitele.com>; Mishael Wexler<Mishael.Wexler@ecitele.com>; pwe3<pwe3@ietf.org>; Oren Gal<Oren.Gal@ecitele.com>; John Shirron<John.Shirron@ecitele.com>; Stewart Bryant \(stbryant@cisco.com\)<stbryant@cisco.com>; Rotem Cohen<Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane: are they compatible? _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… davarish
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Alexander Vainshtein