IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A21F11E826D for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N9VByV12TIGg for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay01-q.rad.co.il [80.74.100.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5939F11E8396 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay01 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Aug 2012 20:57:42 +0300
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:19:13 +0300
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: VCCV2
Thread-Index: Ac1wCmL5ehLaaQv+TH2ez80Jt0Yk9wABVMjwAACTS1A=
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:19:13 +0000
Message-ID: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C813@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C68D@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8C8@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8C8@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.232.33.112]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C813EXRAD5adradcoil_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A090206.50197322.01AB,ss=1,fgs=0
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:19:18 -0000

Greg

Thanks for the opinion on content.
But for the meantime I was asking a question about document format.

Y(J)S

From: Gregory Mirsky [mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 21:17
To: Yaakov Stein; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: RE: VCCV2

Dear Yaakov, Tom, et al.,
I'd support RFC 5085bis rather than formal obsolecence of PW VCCV Control Channel Type 2 and introduction of new Type 4.

    Regards,
        Greg
________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yaakov Stein
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:24 AM
To: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: [PWE3] VCCV2
Hi all

I would like to bring to the list the questions Tom and I raised yesterday.


1)      Should we do a short (and quick turnaround) draft just on the CC types (obsoleting type 2 and introducing type 4) ?

2)      If so, should we merge VCCV2 with VCCV-2 ?

The alternative is a long draft that documents all of VCCV.

Y(J)S

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status