IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Comment on Re: Starting WG adoption call for draft-boutros-pwe3-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02

Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com> Tue, 07 February 2012 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sboutros@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C8011E80BB for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:55:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LmzmqQTUNbWd for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EC211E809D for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:55:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sboutros@cisco.com; l=4049; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1328583345; x=1329792945; h=date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:message-id; bh=HSIpaUhoHbMbyJ9zPqNVbHwj97bMVwTWmDuJFEssNAc=; b=DXCtwvZGb47VkdTqpubgyVhMFXMOygy4tAsbeQ+PTsCjFMOGQM2vlnS/ kAXjhLwMr6m7yy99XxODZmBXgtUSFt45wB5mCTuE82J8PtI22iQedyOb6 LfM1iX6aLKWclu6gsrg/Lh24eAKtSJ7Etla72lWYSbtM2mNwc+vbAruvw A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADCSME+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABCiCKnKYEFgXIBAQEEAQEBDwEKUQsQBwQEFCcHGQgGHxEGARIih2OaHQGXJwSIFYNDEwEIBQMDCSQBgw0FAxIdCiwFIYNYBIhEl26Hcg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,374,1325462400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="27358856"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2012 02:55:45 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q172tjAA019714; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 02:55:45 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:55:45 -0800
Received: from sboutros-wxp01.ciswco.com ([10.21.168.234]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:55:45 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:55:41 -0800
To: Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
From: Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOndX-sD8J8NhkD2vT44p29vwa8Q8M=Dujstq1vwutwcE4tmPQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAOndX-sD8J8NhkD2vT44p29vwa8Q8M=Dujstq1vwutwcE4tmPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_295983281==.ALT"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212SmLAztxc0000007e@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2012 02:55:45.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCAC46A0:01CCE543]
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Comment on Re: Starting WG adoption call for draft-boutros-pwe3-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:55:46 -0000

Hi Sri,

At 03:55 PM 2/6/2012, Sriganesh Kini wrote:
>Hi Sami and other authors,
>
>A few comments
>1. Does the sequence numbers have any rollover procedures or other 
>requirements ?

Sami: This is one of the comments that we need to address for sure as 
we progress the draft..

>2. You mention that there are no security considerations. What if 
>this packet is spoofed by say a man-in-the-middle attack ?

Sami: The reason here is that we will be using static PW-OAM and our 
security will be no better or no worse that what this mechanism provide.

Thanks,

Sami

>On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Andrew G. Malis 
><<mailto:amalis@gmail.com>amalis@gmail.com> wrote:
>This begins a two-week PWE3 WG adoption call for 
><https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-pwe3-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-pwe3-mpls-tp-mac-wd-02 
>, ending February 6. Please respond with your approval, disapproval, 
>and other comments to the PWE3 list. If you don't support the 
>adoption, providing a reason would be useful to the authors and the 
>working group, but is not required. Of course, the reason why you 
>support the draft is also welcome, but also optional. This request 
>will be a part of PWE3 WG adoption calls going forward.
>
>Thanks,
>Andy and Matthew
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pwe3 mailing list
><mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>pwe3@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
>
>
>
>--
>- Sri
>_______________________________________________
>pwe3 mailing list
>pwe3@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status