Return-Path: X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D74921E8118 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:48:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uj5oJvFZxrJR for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E350D21E8041 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q3UNlvFo014377; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:47:59 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.10]) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:47:52 -0400 From: Gregory Mirsky To: Yaakov Stein , "pwe3@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:47:51 -0400 Thread-Topic: In response to discussion of LI/LB for PW at IETF-83 Thread-Index: Ac0nK6eE6CRf1OTeRZSe/a/N5zn7dg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13552C67A83EUSAACMS0715e_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PWE3] In response to discussion of LI/LB for PW at IETF-83 X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:48:00 -0000 --_000_FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13552C67A83EUSAACMS0715e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Yaakov, et al., I've read the minutes and would like to note that: * I did not mumble "no" to your question at the end of time allotted = for the presentation * Proposed extensions, IMO, have nothing to do with timer that might = be associated with Loopback state and would take Maintanence Point out of L= oopback if expired. If such a timer to be enabled its configuration can be = part of OAM configuration through the LDP extensions or LSP Ping. Yaakov, would such timer address your concern with security impact of the p= roposed extension to control LI/LB via control plane? Chairs, I hope that WG minutes can be corrected. Regards, Greg --_000_FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13552C67A83EUSAACMS0715e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Yaakov, et al.,

I've read the minutes and would like to note that:

I did not mumble "no" to your question at the end of time all= otted for the presentation
Proposed extensions, IMO, have nothing t= o do with timer that might be associated with Loopback state and would take= Maintanence Point out of Loopback if expired. If such a timer to be enable= d its configuration can be part of OAM configuration through the LDP extensions or LSP Ping.

Yaakov, would such timer address your concern with security impact of = the proposed extension to control LI/LB via control plane?

Chairs, I hope that WG minutes can be corrected.

Regards,

&nbs= p; Greg

--_000_FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13552C67A83EUSAACMS0715e_--