Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard

["Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)" <[e-mail]>]

makes sense Andy.

Thanks,
Mustapha.

________________________________
From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard

Mustapha,

You might want to wait for any other LC comments before updating.

Thanks,
Andy

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Ooops. Thank you for pointing this out Stewart. I will make the update and publish a new revision.

Mustapha.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:48 PM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard


Authors

There was on point that I notice that you did not address from the AD review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment:

In section 10 you say:

   "This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC
   textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: "

This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page) and it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract.

Stewart



On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to
> Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document:
> - 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit'
>    <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of
>     redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set
>     of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in
>     single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between
>     terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire
>     (MS-PW) applications.
>
>     In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use
>     for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed
>     to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for
>     each PW in a redundant set.
>
>     In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to
>     coordinate a switchover operation of the PW.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>


--
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3