IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4860C11E82CC for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.597, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKlmufUCdI81 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F49811E82CA for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AIP50706; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:51:23 -0700
Received: from SZXEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.138) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:51:27 -0700
Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.86]) by szxeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 04:50:10 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: VCCV2
Thread-Index: Ac1wCmL5ehLaaQv+TH2ez80Jt0Yk9wABVMjwAACTS1AAABFWUAAAIQJQAAUM3lI=
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:50:09 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE22CA335DF@SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C68D@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8C8@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se> <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC90452C813@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF13924D6D8DB@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>, <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5667D23392@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5667D23392@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE22CA335DFSZXEML511MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:52:35 -0000

+1

Best regards,
Mach
________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of David Allan I [david.i.allan@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:24
To: Gregory Mirsky; Yaakov Stein; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

I agree, I've never been happy with the original document, and there is enough updated material that a revision IMO is in order.

cheers
Dave

________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Mirsky
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:22 AM
To: Yaakov Stein; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Yaakov,
let me re-phrase.
I'm for the long draft that documents all of VCCVs.

    Regards,
        Greg

________________________________
From: Yaakov Stein [mailto:yaakov_s@rad.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: RE: VCCV2

Greg

Thanks for the opinion on content.
But for the meantime I was asking a question about document format.

Y(J)S

From: Gregory Mirsky [mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 21:17
To: Yaakov Stein; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: RE: VCCV2

Dear Yaakov, Tom, et al.,
I'd support RFC 5085bis rather than formal obsolecence of PW VCCV Control Channel Type 2 and introduction of new Type 4.

    Regards,
        Greg
________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yaakov Stein
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:24 AM
To: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)
Subject: [PWE3] VCCV2
Hi all

I would like to bring to the list the questions Tom and I raised yesterday.


1)      Should we do a short (and quick turnaround) draft just on the CC types (obsoleting type 2 and introducing type 4) ?

2)      If so, should we merge VCCV2 with VCCV-2 ?

The alternative is a long draft that documents all of VCCV.

Y(J)S

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status