Re: [PWE3] once upon an erratum

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F3021F8600 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3oBtdH2XT8S for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay02.rad.co.il [62.0.23.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E750D21F85FB for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay02 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 May 2012 15:56:11 +0300
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:15:03 +0300
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] once upon an erratum
Thread-Index: Ac0tCaGewFO+Y9uSQqeRIjYDpnZDmwAAqzPQACngdgAADF7kcA==
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:15:02 +0000
Message-ID: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9043C71F4@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9043C64FB@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA02055AF0@FRIDWPPMB001.ecitele.com> <4FAA4442.1050702@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FAA4442.1050702@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.17.140.53]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A090206.4FAA6DD8.0045,ss=1,fgs=0
Subject: Re: [PWE3] once upon an erratum
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:15:08 -0000

> Yaakov

> I think that the purpose of the text as to say that the tag
> may or may not be service delimiting, which I think is
> demonstrably true.

Stewart,

Yes, it is perhaps even tautological to state that it is either one or the other.

However, the text further states that if the tag is inserted by the CE
then the tag is not service delimiting.

This is demonstrably a significant restriction.

Y(J)S