Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Tom, and all,
IMHO and FWIW slides do not replace drafts and (eventually) RFCs.

As for making Type 4 mandatory for non-CW: I think that relegating Type 3 to MS-PW while declaring Type 4 as mandatory is highly problematic because it would mean retrofitting. 

My 2c,
     Sasha

________________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Thomas Nadeau [tnadeau@lucidvision.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:41 PM
To: Mahesh Jethanandani
Cc: Yaakov Stein; pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org) pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

        Take a look at the slides from the meeting as they detail this, but in summary we would eliminate the router alert option. This reduces things down to 2 true modes of operation, and we could also attach some language that clarifies how and when to use both.

        The more comprehensive approach would consolidate all of the existing RFCs/drafts including MPLS-TP. This would normatively redefine all CC Types, would define type 2 as obsolete, type 1 as mandatory for CW, type 4 as mandatory for non-CW, and a variation of type 3 (manipulating TTL) as for multi-segment only

        --Tom

> What would a quick update cover?
>
> On Aug 26, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
>
>> PWE chairs,
>>
>> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update document,
>> or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>>
>> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a "tutorial".
>>
>> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes) an underwhelming response.
>> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>>
>> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>> (A – quick doc   B – full doc   C – A and then possibly B later on)
>>
>> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A, and Mach C in favor of B.
>>  I personally like C too.).
>>
>> Y(J)S
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.