Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Dear Andy, et al.,
Personally I don't see much difference between "then possibly B later on" and "then B later on", as both versions suffer from unspecified timeline. What might be reasonable milestone for 5085bis?

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Yaakov Stein; Thomas Nadeau
Cc: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org) pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Yaakov and Tom,

Matthew and I just talked about the poll results. There were no votes for option A, and the votes were pretty much split between options B and C. Since C is a superset of B, Matthew and I are calling consensus on a slightly modified C, with the word "possibly" removed, so that it now reads "C - A and then B later on".

Thanks,
Andy and Matthew

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> wrote:
> PWE chairs,
>
> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update 
> document, or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>
> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a 
> "tutorial".
>
> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes) 
> an underwhelming response.
>
> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>
> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>
> (A - quick doc   B - full doc   C - A and then possibly B later on)
>
> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A, 
> and Mach C in favor of B.
>
>  I personally like C too.).
>
>
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3