Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard

Mustapha,

You might want to wait for any other LC comments before updating.

Thanks,
Andy

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha) <
mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Ooops. Thank you for pointing this out Stewart. I will make the update and
> publish a new revision.
>
> Mustapha.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:48 PM
> To: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt>
> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
>
>
> Authors
>
> There was on point that I notice that you did not address from the AD
> review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment:
>
> In section 10 you say:
>
>    "This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC
>    textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: "
>
> This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page) and
> it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract.
>
> Stewart
>
>
>
> On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote:
> > The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to
> > Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document:
> > - 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit'
> >    <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
> >
> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may
> > be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> >
> >     This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of
> >     redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set
> >     of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in
> >     single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between
> >     terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire
> >     (MS-PW) applications.
> >
> >     In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use
> >     for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed
> >     to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for
> >     each PW in a redundant set.
> >
> >     In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to
> >     coordinate a switchover operation of the PW.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The file can be obtained via
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/
> >
> > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/
> >
> >
> > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IETF-Announce mailing list
> > IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> >
>
>
> --
> For corporate legal information go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>