Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Yaakov and Tom,

Matthew and I just talked about the poll results. There were no votes
for option A, and the votes were pretty much split between options B
and C. Since C is a superset of B, Matthew and I are calling consensus
on a slightly modified C, with the word "possibly" removed, so that it
now reads "C – A and then B later on".

Thanks,
Andy and Matthew

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> wrote:
> PWE chairs,
>
> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update
> document, or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>
> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a
> "tutorial".
>
> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes) an
> underwhelming response.
>
> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>
> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>
> (A – quick doc   B – full doc   C – A and then possibly B later on)
>
> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A, and
> Mach C in favor of B.
>
>  I personally like C too.).
>
>
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>