Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 07 March 2012 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB5521E80B1; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:47:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pk+DdIp010NR; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE1521E8017; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:47:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; l=2468; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1331142456; x=1332352056; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oIzDZmDtj9WF8gdcCGmGIVhI7NDXgMWrvnYnDPuQFcY=; b=FFKricc0UIOWwiuFo8k9D6UF8XHAgQeWTRei8ZOa1g+ubh06RWes/KMS pCBve87G5OYkNynYwRlAU66Ou9dd2ZPol3mKw79q76ZYuDQ8iapHc50uM FkUcfZhSWAVxJ//pVqLWpMmik8fAy4WP9z/74p1Nc/KJgTaL0qv4+bBSI Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAEKeV0+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABEtR2BB4IKAQEBBAEBAQ8BAgEiNgoBEAsYCRYECwkDAgECARUfERMBBQIBAR6HZguaPwGDMQ8Bm1mNTYMiBJVBkBeCYw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,547,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="131622045"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2012 17:47:34 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q27HlYjR006994; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:47:34 GMT
Received: from stbryant-mac2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id q27HlVTN011204; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:47:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4F579F33.7050508@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:47:31 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit@tools.ietf.org
References: <20120307170032.20594.20281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120307170032.20594.20281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:47:38 -0000

Authors

There was on point that I notice that you did not address
from the AD review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment:

In section 10 you say:

    "This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC
    textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: "

This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page)
and it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract.

Stewart



On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to
> Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document:
> - 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit'
>    <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of
>     redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set
>     of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in
>     single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between
>     terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire
>     (MS-PW) applications.
>
>     In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use
>     for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed
>     to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for
>     each PW in a redundant set.
>
>     In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to
>     coordinate a switchover operation of the PW.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html