[PWE3] draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Sun, 27 July 2014 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55861A03A5 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPmyKr_X0SSU for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay01-ib1.rad.com [94.188.133.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD4D1A03AC for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay01 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jul 2014 18:37:13 +0300
Received: from EXRAD6.ad.rad.co.il (2002:c072:18be::c072:18be) by exrad6.ad.rad.co.il (2002:c072:18be::c072:18be) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.38; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:49:19 +0300
Received: from EXRAD6.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::f157:6202:5fc8:a4f0]) by exrad6.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::f157:6202:5fc8:a4f0%12]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.031; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:49:19 +0300
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
Thread-Index: Ac+pslB+jjdflssJRm62TKLfnjjPbg==
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:49:18 +0000
Message-ID: <10f3d01039fb4d77bea5cf35095ec3c9@exrad6.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [94.188.160.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_10f3d01039fb4d77bea5cf35095ec3c9exrad6adradcoil_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A090204.53D51F93.007D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 (Unknown)
Spam-Score: -2.40
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/n9Y8-tkIYzlvZTkgs7I8P1NijNE
Subject: [PWE3] draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:49:44 -0000

All,

As I asked at the session last week, I am interested in hearing if anyone knows of deployment
of Type B PON protection, which is the case this draft is trying to facilitate.

If this is heavily deployed, then I support adoption of this draft.
If it is not deployed, then I think we don't need it.

Y(J)S