IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] WG LC on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt

Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com> Fri, 17 June 2011 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lmartini@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB16B11E80EF for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfmg6wyVhS4u for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from napoleon.monoski.com (napoleon.monoski.com [70.90.113.113]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561FF11E807F for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seven.monoski.com ([64.101.67.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by napoleon.monoski.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5HLcORC023529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:38:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DFBC94B.9010801@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:38:19 -0600
From: Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
References: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD521B518CF3@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD521B518CF3@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000908010605000809050103"
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] WG LC on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:38:34 -0000

Dave,
And everybody else.

Thanks you for your support!
Since this document does not describe anything of what you mentioned below,
you must be a supporter !

Please read the document .

Thank you.
Luca


On 06/09/2011 04:43 PM, David Allan I wrote:
> I'm opposed to this draft progressing at this time.
>
> At the moment the PW with a CW is a unifying agent that will work in both TP domains and those that employ ECMP and LAG. The GAL/ACh version cannot make this claim.
>
> What would be required to make this acceptable IMO would be agreement with the MPLS WG to produce an RFC that documented excluding reserved labels from ECMP consideration such that GAL/GACh encapsulated PW OAM had "feature parity" with ACh encapsulated PW-OAM...
>
> Then we could reasonably consider taking steps to move to a common OAM encapsulation mechanism common to LSPs and PWs.
>
> My 2 cents
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status