IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-01 - RFC4447

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Tue, 05 August 2014 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B77D1B27C6; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G-_8fT1Ea7xE; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3lrp0082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0141B1B27BC; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.110.144) by AM3PR03MB419.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.110.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.14; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:59:52 +0000
Received: from AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.110.144) by AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.110.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.14; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:59:50 +0000
Received: from AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.110.144]) by AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.110.144]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.014; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:59:50 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-01 - RFC4447
Thread-Index: AQHPsLKATtmDXehXFE2xGhx0gc5WeZvCCNcA
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:59:49 +0000
Message-ID: <9696d0db139d46ffaad7be11340215e8@AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <53D7B569.60400@cisco.com> <c6469ff0a32a405e833e7989a90ed6e6@BY2PR05MB728.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <53E0B85B.8060707@cisco.com> <eba24c5998984ec18d19cc85b456944b@AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <53E0DE3E.5030901@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53E0DE3E.5030901@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.56.21]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
x-forefront-prvs: 02945962BD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(199002)(51694002)(189002)(51704005)(13464003)(252514010)(377454003)(101416001)(76576001)(66066001)(74316001)(86362001)(74662001)(83072002)(80022001)(74502001)(20776003)(87936001)(106356001)(105586002)(81542001)(85306004)(106116001)(21056001)(64706001)(46102001)(81342001)(107046002)(85852003)(79102001)(33646002)(4396001)(77982001)(92566001)(110136001)(54356999)(99396002)(50986999)(19580405001)(76176999)(2656002)(2351001)(95666004)(93886004)(83322001)(19580395003)(76482001)(31966008)(24736002)(108616003); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR03MB612; H:AM3PR03MB612.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/qqP6sOYXKdrfEg-2-TL0fPzGcGY
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-01 - RFC4447
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:59:57 -0000

Stewart,
I fully agree with you that using PW labels from a  label space that is not a per-platform one requires an explicit update to RFC 4447.
My comment on this point has been triggered by your saying that you *think* that RFC 4447 explicitly requires per-platform label space.
Just wanted to clarify that this is indeed the case.

Regards,
       Sasha 
Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
Mobile: 054-9266302


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 4:38 PM
> To: Alexander Vainshtein; Yimin Shen
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; pwe3; pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pwe3-endpoint-fast-
> protection-01 - RFC4447
> 
> 
> >>> [1] This draft is completely based on the PWE3 and the MS-PW
> >> architecture. It is also based on RFC 5331 " MPLS Upstream Label
> >> Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space". So ideally readers
> >> should be familiar with that RFC.
> >> As far as I can see context labels have not been introduced into the
> >> PWE3 architecture. There is some reference to their use for P2MP PWs,
> >> but not in the P2P case. Indeed I think that RFC4447 notes explicitly
> >> that in the case where the configuration of PWs is signaled by LDP
> >> the platform label space must be used. The least that you need to do
> >> is to update RFC4447.
> >>
> > [[Sasha]] yes, RFC 4447 explicitly requires the PW labels to be allocated
> from the per-platform label space.
> > And according to RFC 5331 per-platform label space is a special case of the
> label context.
> However RRC5331 does not update RFC4447, so it must be assumed that the
> original definition of per-platform label space applies to PWs.
> 
> - Stewart
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email