IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?

"Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)" <mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 02 June 2011 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58117E07A1 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XTNLjYCnnln for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01180E0786 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p52EO6Cj029347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:24:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.112]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p52EO3ql012685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:24:06 -0500
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.145]) by USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.112]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:24:05 -0500
From: "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)" <mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>, "Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" <praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:24:03 -0500
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?
Thread-Index: AcwhLWLc82QLF/v0TA+rKmMbQ9x4NAAAsSSw
Message-ID: <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50AD10B8B4B@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BDB8AF57@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BDB8AF57@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50AD10B8B4BUSNAVSXCHMBSC_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: Manish Vora <Manish.Vora@ecitele.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, Robert Rennison <Robert.Rennison@ecitele.com>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:24:11 -0000

Sasha,
I was planning on publishing version 04 of draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy at the same time as the solution one. I however missed the publication deadline for the last IETF meeting. I should be able of publishing this shortly.

Regards,
Mustapha.

________________________________
From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:00 AM
To: Muley, Praveen V (Praveen); Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org; Manish Vora; Prashant Desai; Robert Rennison; Rotem Cohen
Subject: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy?

Praveen, Mustafa and all,

I've looked up the PWE3 redundancy drafts at the IETF web site and only found one of them (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-04) Its mate (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-03) has expired some time ago.

To add to the confusion, the existing  draft contains a reference to -04 version (missing) of the expired one.
This suggests that expiration of the PW redundancy draft was not intentional.

Did I miss something? Are the Editors merging the two drafts back (after splitting the original draft-muley)?

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
     Sasha


This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status