Re: [PWE3] Updates to goals and milestones

[Carlos Pignataro <[e-mail]>]

Matthew,

I agree, sounds like a good approach.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On May 8, 2012, at 6:19 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) wrote:

> Greg, Carlos,
> 
> I think this milestone started life as referring to any PW OAM extensions required for MPLS-TP. However, it has become very ambiguous. There are really a number of objectives that we should capture, including at least the following:
> 
> Additional VCCV Channel Type using the GAL
> VCCV capability negotiation for MPLS-TP OAM tools.
> Rationalisation of VCCV (RFC5085bis)
> 
> I think we could replace this milestone with milestones for the above.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Matthew
> 
> On 04/05/2012 20:53, "Gregory Mirsky" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Matthew, Carlos, et al.,
>> I agree with Carlos that updates to VCCV Control Channels resulting from discussion of GAL as Type 4 VCCV CC, perhaps as RFC5085bis, can be captured in Milestones. But I think that this work not necessarily tied with CV capability extension that, I think, referenced as "Enhanced PW OAM".
>>  
>>     Regards,
>>         Greg
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 4:38 AM
>> To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
>> Cc: [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Updates to goals and milestones
>> 
>> Matthew,
>> 
>> In Paris there was discussion (and subsequent followup) about a VCCV-bis document. I am not sure if a formal consensus call was issued on that, but I wonder if it needs to be captured as a milestone (or how it relates to "Enhanced PW OAM"). 
>> 
>> Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
>> Excuze typofraphicak errows
>> 
>> On May 4, 2012, at 6:39 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> Please find below a proposed list of updates to the WG goals and milestones that was presented in Paris, with one modification pushing the P2MP Requirements LC back to Dec 2012.
>>> 
>>> Please post any comments to the list before Friday 11th May.
>>> 
>>> Matthew
>>> 
>>>  Done     - PWE3 WG started, organize editing teams.
>>>   Done     - Hold interim meeting, including discussion of priority of service-specific documents and consider pruning some deliverables
>>>   Done     - Accept drafts of service-specific documents as WG items
>>>   Done     - PW Requirements Document Last Call
>>>   Done     - TDM Circuit Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - ATM Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - Ethernet Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - Fragmentation LC
>>>   Done     - TDM Requirements LC
>>>   Done     - SONET Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - TDM Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - Frame Relay Documents Last Call
>>>   Done     - FCS retention Last Call
>>>   Done     - Multi-Segment PW Requirements LC
>>>   Done     - VCCV LC
>>>   Done     - PWE3 Services MIBs LC
>>>   Done     - PPP/HDLC PW LC
>>>   Done     - Wildcard FEC LC
>>>   Done     - TDM Signaling LC
>>>   Done- Multi-Segment Architecture LC
>>>   Done     - Basic Pseudowire MIBs LC
>>>   Done - PW OAM Mapping LC
>>>   Done - Multi-Segment PW LC
>>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration Requirements LC
>>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration Architecture
>>>   Done - Generic Associated Channel Header LC
>>>   Done - PW Protection and Restoration LC
>>>   Done - Fiber Channel Encap LC
>>>   Done- Multipath PW LC
>>>   Done  - Packet PW Requirements / solution
>>>   Dec  2012- P2MP Requirements LC
>>>   Done  – PW Status signalling in static/MPLS-TP
>>>   July 2012 - Dynamic MS PW LC
>>>   Sept 2012- Enhanced PW OAM
>>>   Sept 2011 – Signaling extensions for MPLS-TP OAM
>>>   Dec 2012- Multisegment PW MIB
>>>   Dec 2012- Security Considerations LC
>>>   Dec 2012– Congestion Considerations 
>>>  Dec  2012- P2MP PW Signaling (root initiated)
>>>  Dec 2012– P2MP PW Signaling (leaf initiated)
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pwe3 mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3