Re: [PWE3] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt

lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn Tue, 26 April 2011 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AA0E06F5; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Q1w7KQd8+J7; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20339E067C; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 125202203882679; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:42:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 4886.2203882679; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:43:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p3Q5hMUa059145; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:43:22 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.135.1302894018.17628.pwe3@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on JinLiZhong127666/user/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-04-25 20:13:22, Serialize by Notes Client on JinLiZhong127666/user/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-04-25 20:13:22, Serialize complete at 2011-04-25 20:13:22, S/MIME Sign failed at 2011-04-25 20:13:22: The cryptographic key was not found, S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on JinLiZhong127666/user/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-04-26 13:43:27, Serialize by Notes Client on JinLiZhong127666/user/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-04-26 13:43:27, Serialize complete at 2011-04-26 13:43:27, S/MIME Sign failed at 2011-04-26 13:43:27: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-04-26 13:43:23, Serialize complete at 2011-04-26 13:43:23
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Sensitivity:
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF799B29A6.0336F104-ON4825787D.00410328-4825787E.001F71D1@zte.com.cn>
From: lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:43:23 +0800
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001F71CD4825787E_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p3Q5hMUa059145
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:43:37 -0000

Hi all,
This draft is to collect all possible solutions to reach a most optimized 
one. In this 00 version of the draft, we got an alternative option at 
appendixB, and give a brief comparison between the two options. For better 
backward compatibility, we still keep the "label request message" option. 
If you have any preference or comments about the two options, please tell 
us.

Also cc to MPLS WG, to ask for comments about the FEC128/129 update in 
current draft. There are many parameters in FEC128/129 which is not like 
prefix-FEC. In this draft, if a PE receives a label mapping with same FEC 
parameter and label, but only different Cbit value than previously 
received, then PE will update this FEC with new Cbit value.

Thanks
Lizhong


> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:45:02 -0700
> From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: [PWE3] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt
> Message-ID: <20110415174502.28931.24336.idtracker@ietfc.amsl.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge 
> Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>     Title         : Pseudowire Control Word Negotiation Mechanism Update
> 
>     Author(s)     : V. Manral, et al
>     Filename      : draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt
>     Pages         : 10
>     Date          : 2011-04-15
> 
>    This document describes the problem of control word negotiation 
>    mechanism specified in [RFC4447].  Based on the problem analysis, a 
>    message exchanging mechanism is introduced to solve this control word 

>    negotiation issue.  This document is to update [RFC4447] control word 

>    negotiation mechanism.
> 
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt

> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.
> 

--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.