[PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with draft-pw-redundancy-bit
"Daniel Cohn" <DanielC@orckit.com> Thu, 15 March 2012 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <DanielC@orckit.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CE521F8650 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2qmRh2c39si for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tlvmail1.orckit.com (tlvmail1.orckit.com [109.226.33.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0D421F8503 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD02A8.E3D05F1F"
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:38:18 +0200
Message-ID: <44F4E579A764584EA9BDFD07D0CA081307670E33@tlvmail1>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with draft-pw-redundancy-bit
Thread-Index: Ac0CqH/qtyJRd8+JRXuyEnS5aYeGKQ==
From: Daniel Cohn <DanielC@orckit.com>
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with draft-pw-redundancy-bit
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:38:22 -0000
Hi draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp authors and list at large, Is there a reason why the ICCP draft does not explicit reference the pw redundancy draft? It does mention active/standby signaling for the PWs, so implicitly it seems to assume that the other endpoint is implementing draft-pw-redundancy-bit, but in that case some details are missing such as which pw redundancy mode should be used (e.g. master/slave), how PW precedence should be configured, etc. Is this something you plan to add in future revisions? Thanks, Daniel
- [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with draf… Daniel Cohn
- Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with … Samer Salam
- Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with … Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with … Lizhong Jin
- Re: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp interaction with … Luca Martini