IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)[any problems with proposal?]

Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> Fri, 03 July 1998 21:51 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 17:51:43 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id RAA28936 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:51:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id RAA25801 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA13086 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:51:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:47:36 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA12474 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:42:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980703144211.009725f0@garfield>
X-Sender: hastings@garfield
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 14:42:11 PDT
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
From: Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)[any problems with proposal?]
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
In-Reply-To: <199807032113.RAA19184@spot.cs.utk.edu>
Illegal-Object: Syntax error in References: value found on alpha.xerox.com: References: <Yourmessage of"Fri, 03 Jul 1998 13:26:17 PDT." <3.0.5.32.19980703132617.0093ea50@garfield> ^-illegal end of message identification
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

Keith,

How long does an IESG ballot take?  When would it be done?

Isn't there some IESG expert that can bless this proposal now, so that we can
discuss it and put it in our documents?

I'm afraid that the WG is running out of patience with this prolonged
process and I'm trying to see how we can work out a technical solution.
Can't you forward the ipp scheme proposal to some experts for review
now to see if it is acceptable and correct?

Thanks,
Tom


At 14:13 07/03/98 PDT, Keith Moore wrote:
>Tom,
>
>The best thing to do at this point would be for me to run this proposal
>by the entire IESG when it is balloted.  So I'll include it in the 
>formal ballot that gets sent to IESG.
>
>Keith
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email