Re: JMP> Re: job mib feedback [more explanation about attributes]
Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> Tue, 28 July 1998 07:43 UTC
Delivery-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:43:13 -0400
Return-Path: jmp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id DAA07709 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id DAA08761 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA02178 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:43:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:41:04 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA01836 for jmp-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 03:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980728003822.02072c00@garfield>
X-Sender: hastings@garfield
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:38:22 -0700
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
From: Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: JMP> Re: job mib feedback [more explanation about attributes]
Cc: chrisw@ilw.com, moore@cs.utk.edu, Bert Wijnen <WIJNEN@vnet.ibm.com>, Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no, scoya@ietf.org, jkrey@isi.edu, jmp@pwg.org, "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@scruznet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980727233250.00bf91c0@garfield>
References: <199807271855.OAA19942@spot.cs.utk.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: jmp-owner@pwg.org
At 11:55 07/27/98 PDT, Keith Moore wrote: snip ... >> 3.The structure of the MIB is totaly "non-SNMP" like. >> It is the 2nd wierdest MIB I have ever seen. >> I have difficulty saying go ahead and publish. >> But... it is work of the PWG which is outside of the >> IETF, right? So not sure what we can/should do. >> I would certainly NOT let this thing go on the standards >> track. To see the variations of job submission protocols for representing job objects, we mapped the attributes of 10 print job submission protocols to the Job Monitoring MIB. Please refer to draft-ietf-printmib-job-protomap-03.txt. It shows that some job submission protocols have very few attributes and some have a lot of attributes. Many printers have to support more than one job submission protocol. The Job MIB is attempting to allow a printer that supports multiple job submission protocols to support them with a single MIB. Thus the Job MIB allows a management application to query jobs that were submitted using different job submission protocol, but that are all in the same "queue" for the printer, and get their job attributes. Thanks, Tom
- JMP> Re: job mib feedback Tom Hastings
- JMP> Re: job mib feedback [more explanation about… Tom Hastings
- Re: JMP> Re: job mib feedback [more explanation a… Tom Hastings