Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint and job-id]

Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> Tue, 07 July 1998 05:47 UTC

Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 01:47:44 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id BAA16661 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:47:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id BAA06677 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA09415 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:43:16 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA08655 for ipp-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:38:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980706223823.0142bbe0@garfield>
X-Sender: hastings@garfield
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 22:38:23 PDT
To: Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com>
From: Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint and job-id]
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980706162037.01412930@garfield>
Illegal-Object: Syntax error in References: value found on alpha.xerox.com: References: <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6DDB@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com> ^-illegal end of message identification
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

At 16:20 7/6/98 PDT, Tom Hastings wrote:
>At 10:49 6/29/98 PDT, Paul Moore wrote:
>>to ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_MOD/
>>Describes 7 new operations that MS may be using for IPP1.0
>>
>>We should discuss whther we want to make any of these standard extensions
>

One further question about Reprint-Job:

For ISO DPA Resubmit-Job, we finally decided that a new copy of the job
should be created and assigned a new job-identifier.  This was so that 
accounting would not get confused with a job that was resubmitted several
times.  Also by making a copy, any accounting done using the PWG Job
Monitoring MIB, can be safely done while the job is in the 'completed'
state, even if the job is resubmitted immediately before the accounting
can be gathered for the job just completed, since a new job is created
with a copy of all of the originally submitted attributes.

For the Reprint-Job, we could do the same and require that the IPP object
return a new job-id and make a copy of the job.  On the other hand, since
the user cannot modify the job, a simpler approach to keep the accounting
straight (and reflect the true state of the job), would be to add a Job 
Description attribute which is a count
of the number of Reprint-Job operations performed.  This "number-of-reprints" 
Job Description attribute would be REQUIRED to be supported, if the IPP
object 
supports the Reprint-Job operation.  An accounting application would take 
note of the value for the "number-of-reprints" which is normally 0 if
no Reprint-Job operation has been performed.

So we can save the harder ISO DPA Modify-Job and Resubmit-Job operations
which modify the job to later.

Thanks,
Tom