Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint and job-id]
Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> Tue, 07 July 1998 05:47 UTC
Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 01:47:44 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1])
by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id BAA16661
for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:47:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30])
by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id BAA06677
for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA09415 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>;
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:43:16 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
BAA08655 for ipp-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:38:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980706223823.0142bbe0@garfield>
X-Sender: hastings@garfield
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 22:38:23 PDT
To: Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com>
From: Tom Hastings <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint and job-id]
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980706162037.01412930@garfield>
Illegal-Object: Syntax error in References: value found on alpha.xerox.com:
References: <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6DDB@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
^-illegal end of message identification
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
At 16:20 7/6/98 PDT, Tom Hastings wrote: >At 10:49 6/29/98 PDT, Paul Moore wrote: >>to ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_MOD/ >>Describes 7 new operations that MS may be using for IPP1.0 >> >>We should discuss whther we want to make any of these standard extensions > One further question about Reprint-Job: For ISO DPA Resubmit-Job, we finally decided that a new copy of the job should be created and assigned a new job-identifier. This was so that accounting would not get confused with a job that was resubmitted several times. Also by making a copy, any accounting done using the PWG Job Monitoring MIB, can be safely done while the job is in the 'completed' state, even if the job is resubmitted immediately before the accounting can be gathered for the job just completed, since a new job is created with a copy of all of the originally submitted attributes. For the Reprint-Job, we could do the same and require that the IPP object return a new job-id and make a copy of the job. On the other hand, since the user cannot modify the job, a simpler approach to keep the accounting straight (and reflect the true state of the job), would be to add a Job Description attribute which is a count of the number of Reprint-Job operations performed. This "number-of-reprints" Job Description attribute would be REQUIRED to be supported, if the IPP object supports the Reprint-Job operation. An accounting application would take note of the value for the "number-of-reprints" which is normally 0 if no Reprint-Job operation has been performed. So we can save the harder ISO DPA Modify-Job and Resubmit-Job operations which modify the job to later. Thanks, Tom
- Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [some que… Tom Hastings
- Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint … Tom Hastings
- Re: IPP> MS-new-operations.htm uploaded [Reprint … Tom Hastings