IPP> Re: IPP Scheme

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Tue, 14 July 1998 00:04 UTC

Delivery-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 20:04:39 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id UAA09006 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 20:04:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id UAA06690 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 20:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA04983 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 20:04:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Mon, 13 Jul 1998 19:59:56 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA04363 for ipp-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 19:58:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199807132357.TAA05008@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: Randy Turner <rturner@sharplabs.com>
cc: "Carl Kugler" <kugler@us.ibm.com>, ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: IPP> Re: IPP Scheme
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:07:32 PDT." <199807131613.JAA22533@mail.pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 19:57:53 -0400
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

> Keith was suggesting that, in the absence of a proxy server, that "ipp:"
> URLs would be used in both HTTP headers and in the application/ipp body
> part. I believe this would definitely impact generic HTTP 1.1 web servers.

yes, and I agree.  which is why I proposed that the http: form of the
URL could always be used at the HTTP layer.

Keith