IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Sat, 11 July 1998 23:59 UTC
Delivery-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:59:44 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1])
by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id TAA26639
for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:59:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30])
by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id TAA25293
for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA16521 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>;
Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:54:20 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
TAA15956 for ipp-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199807112349.TAA21923@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: don@lexmark.com
cc: ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Jul 1998 17:15:11 EDT."
<199807112121.AA28852@interlock2.lexmark.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:49:00 -0400
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
> It seems to me there are few if any clear, overwhelming technical merits on > either side of the proposals. The printing community is firm on how it > believes customers and users will perceive and use IPP and believes "ipp:" > is not the right approach. Since other than encoded within the > application/ipp body, "ipp:" is never on the wire, there is no real > difference from the network's infrastructure That's not true. ipp: would appear "on the wire" in all sorts of places -- in HTML documents, LDAP responses, ACAP responses, etc. -- any time someone needs to refer to a printer. Keith
- IPP> New IPP Scheme don
- IPP> New IPP Scheme don
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore