Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?
Harry Lewis <harryl@us.ibm.com> Wed, 15 July 1998 15:10 UTC
Delivery-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:10:57 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1])
by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id LAA17004
for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:10:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30])
by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id LAA15122
for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA24128 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>;
Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:05:13 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
LAA23563 for ipp-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:03:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Harry Lewis <harryl@us.ibm.com>
To: <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.coM>
Subject: Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?
Message-ID: <5030100023168486000002L062*@MHS>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:02:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id LAA17004
Carl-Uno. thank you very much for the summary. This is quite helpful. I would like to seek even further clarification. >"ipp:" will NEVER be used on the HTTP layer. Is this the same as saying that (by example) ipp://my.printer.com will ALWAYS mean http://my.printer.com:631 and (by further example) ipp://my.printer.com:444 will mean http://my.printer.com:444? Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
- IPP> Where do we stand in the debate? Carl-Uno Manros
- Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate? Harry Lewis
- Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate? Randy Turner