Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Thu, 02 July 1998 20:26 UTC

Delivery-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 16:26:29 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA10608 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:26:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA23287 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA06040 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:26:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:22:17 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA05425 for ipp-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:19:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199807022018.QAA11535@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: Carl-Uno Manros <manros@cp10.es.xerox.com>
cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Jul 1998 11:51:23 PDT." <3.0.5.32.19980702115123.00bec240@garfield>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 16:18:24 -0400
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

> Are going to insist on ipp: in order to pass on the IPP specs?

IESG is.  Nobody could make a case for it being any other way.

Keith