IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Thu, 16 July 1998 21:49 UTC
Delivery-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:49:32 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1])
by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id RAA22630
for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30])
by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id RAA23406
for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:49:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA27177 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>;
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:49:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:45:37 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
RAA26578 for ipp-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:42:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199807162141.RAA27176@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "Carl Kugler" <kugler@us.ibm.com>
cc: ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
In-reply-to: Your message of "16 Jul 1998 16:18:26 -0000."
<19980716161826.21898.qmail@m2.findmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:41:51 -0400
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
> > Sorry Larry, but my printer isn't on the default IPP port of 631. Mine is > > on 80 so my URL is exactly right. Not all implementations MUST be on 631. > ... > That's not how I read ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp-pro-980630 > > It says "It is REQUIRED that a printer implementation support HTTP over the > IANA assigned Well Known Port 631...". Therefore, a conforming > implementation MUST be on 631, although it might also be on some other > port simultaneously. No, I don't think so. Implementations should default to port 631, but people who buy these things should be able to change that default to anything they want. Here's how I would say this: 1. Implementations MUST support the ability to accept IPP requests on port 631. 2. Implementations MAY support the ability to accept IPP requests on other ports instead of, or in addition to, port 631, but only if explicitly configured to do so by the printer administrator. Keith
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Scott Lawrence
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Larry Masinter
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jim Walker
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Larry Masinter
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Randy Turner
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jay Martin
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Roger K Debry
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jay Martin
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme papowell
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme papowell
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Manros, Carl-Uno B
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot