RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
don@lexmark.com Thu, 16 July 1998 17:05 UTC
Delivery-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:05:13 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1])
by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA17917
for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30])
by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA21433
for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA19808 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>;
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:05:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:00:40 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
MAA19192 for ipp-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:55:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: don@lexmark.com
Message-Id: <199807161655.AA25353@interlock2.lexmark.com>
X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LEXMARK@LEXMTA
To: "Carl Kugler" <kugler@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ipp@pwg.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:55:00 -0400
Subject: RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
Carl: The implementation MUST support port 631 however, mine is administratively set to only OPERATE on port 80. The code is compliant. Don "Carl Kugler" <kugler%us.ibm.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on 07/16/98 12:18:26 PM To: ipp%pwg.org@interlock.lexmark.com cc: (bcc: Don Wright) bcc: Don Wright Subject: RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme ... > Sorry Larry, but my printer isn't on the default IPP port of 631. Mine is > on 80 so my URL is exactly right. Not all implementations MUST be on 631. ... That's not how I read ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp-pro-980630 It says "It is REQUIRED that a printer implementation support HTTP over the IANA assigned Well Known Port 631...". Therefore, a conforming implementation MUST be on 631, although it might also be on some other port simultaneously. ----- Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/ipp/?start=4106 Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Scott Lawrence
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Larry Masinter
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jim Walker
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Larry Masinter
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Randy Turner
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jay Martin
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Roger K Debry
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Jay Martin
- IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Keith Moore
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme don
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme papowell
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme papowell
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Carl Kugler
- RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Manros, Carl-Uno B
- Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme Robert Herriot