IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme

don@lexmark.com Mon, 13 July 1998 11:38 UTC

Delivery-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:38:22 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id HAA24947 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id HAA02553 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA20648 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:24:52 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA20070 for ipp-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: don@lexmark.com
Message-Id: <199807131122.AA01871@interlock2.lexmark.com>
X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LEXMARK@LEXMTA
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Cc: Ipp@pwg.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:22:19 -0400
Subject: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

Keith Moore said:

>> My argument stands, the right people to deal
>> with the user's perception are the people shipping the products and they
>> have reach consensus that "ipp:" is the wrong answer.
>
>The folks who are shipping printers aren't even close to representative
>of the people who are going to be using this stuff.

Too bad you don't know the people that have been working on this for more
than a year.  The group includes people not only from the printer
manufacturers you seem to think haven't the foggiest what their users want
but also _people_ with a great deal of experience in Operating Systems
(employees of Microsoft, Sun & IBM), Network Operating Systems (employees
of Microsoft, IBM & Novell) as well as printing software (employees of
Underscore & North Lake.)  Not only do these people have a great deal of
experience in this area but, despite the IETF's blinders, as
representatives of companies developing commercial products, _we_ and our
companies are going to have to support this when it hits the field.  Are
you making a multimillion dollar support committment to the "ipp:" concept?

In conjunction with those of us who not only manufacture printers but also
provide both Web and non-Web based configuration and management utilities,
I think this group has a great understanding of what real-world users want
and expect.  Oh, and by the way, _we_ all are also computer users generally
using the fairly up to date operating system, etc. on a day to day basis.

IPP is not a printer manufacturer "railroad."  It is a broad-based,
printing industry cooperative effort that has reach its conclusion based
upon years and years of experience.


**********************************************
* Don Wright                 don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances       *
* Lexmark International                      *
* 740 New Circle Rd                          *
* Lexington, Ky 40550                        *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax)    *
**********************************************