IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)

Carl-Uno Manros <manros@cp10.es.xerox.com> Thu, 02 July 1998 19:01 UTC

Delivery-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 15:01:14 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA09903 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 15:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA22831 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 15:03:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA02874 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 15:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 2 Jul 1998 14:57:06 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA02273 for ipp-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 14:51:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980702115123.00bec240@garfield>
X-Sender: cmanros@garfield
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:51:23 PDT
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
From: Carl-Uno Manros <manros@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
In-Reply-To: <199807021816.OAA11217@spot.cs.utk.edu>
Illegal-Object: Syntax error in References: value found on alpha.xerox.com: References: <Yourmessage of"Thu, 02 Jul 1998 10:53:32 PDT." <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6E27@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com> ^-illegal end of message identification
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

At 11:16 AM 7/2/98 PDT, Keith Moore wrote:

>No, ipp: needs to go over the wire in all of the IPP protocol elements.

Keith,

I think that this is where the disconnect is. 

I know that most of the people who participated in the phone conference
with you on this subject, heard you stating that ipp: was NOT going over
the wire, which is why you thought that the WG had accepted your proposal.

When it became clear that ipp: is INDEED going over the wire, people
disagreed with your proposal.

Are going to insist on ipp: in order to pass on the IPP specs?

Carl-Uno
Carl-Uno Manros
Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email