IPP> Re: The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Sat, 04 July 1998 02:01 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 22:01:45 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id WAA29778 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 22:01:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id WAA26058 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 22:04:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA20600 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 22:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 3 Jul 1998 21:57:35 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA19924 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 21:51:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199807040150.VAA21826@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com>
cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, ipp@pwg.org, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: IPP> Re: The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Jul 1998 20:30:38 EDT." <359D77AE.7F583A51@underscore.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 21:50:45 -0400
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

> A quick aside, your Unix example is quite nice, I agree.
> However, those not familiar with Unix (and all the common
> variants) should understand that your example is actually
> not valid, at least from stock O/S vendors.
> 
> Perhaps you were thinking of the capabilities provided by
> Patrick Powell's fine LPRng suite, which exposes network-
> attached printers using standard hostname conventions
> (rather than sysadmin-defined printer objects on the local
> platform).

Actually, I was thinking about the lpr client that I wrote
many years ago, that allows the user to specify host and
printer name on the command-line.  

Sadly, most current UNIX print systems also require explicit 
configuration, even for a remote printer with a lpd interface.

Keith