Re: [PWOT] draft-anavi-tdmoip-01.txt

Motty,

>     This draft proposes a simple way of transporting TDM circuits over IP.
>It can be found on the IETF web site at:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-anavi-tdmoip-01.txt
>
>I would appreciate any comments you might have.

I agree that it's very simple, but it seems to have skimped on many of the 
issues and details that have been discussed previously in 
draft-boyle-sts-ip-00.txt and draft-malis-sonet-ces-mpls-03.txt, such as 
non-synchronous timing recovery, synchronous justification events, outage 
signaling, efficiency, and interactions with Internet traffic engineering.

In addition, AAL1 and AAL2 also make a number of assumptions based upon 
their usage above ATM, such as insured cell sequentiality and particular 
jitter and loss bounds, that need to be made explicit if you attempt to use 
them over IP rather than ATM.  I would be interested in hearing if you are 
aware of their successful use in non-ATM environments.

My final comment is that your text is very unclear regarding the use of 
RTP.  Its use is discussed in section 2, but not in section 5.  Is it used, 
or not?

Cheers,
Andy

========

At 3/5/2001 12:22 PM -0500, Motty Anavi wrote:
>FYI,
>
>-- Cheers, Motty
>
>Motty Anavi               |900 Corporate Dr.
>RAD data communication    |Mahwah, NJ 07430
>Dir. of Product Management|(201)529-1100x213
>e-mail: motty@radusa.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pwot mailing list
>pwot@ietf.org
>http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot

_______________________________________________
pwot mailing list
pwot@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot