RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip

From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com]
> 
> > 1) is an mpls lsp an example of a "pseudo-wire?" 
> 
> > 2) can ip be regarded as "transport?" 
> 
> I'm  not sure this  is the  right approach.   If we  follow 
> this  out, those
> brainiacs in  the IESG are  likely to tell  us that the  MPLS 
> LSP has  to be
> carried as a VC in something like 
> draft-martini-l2circuit-encap-mpls-01.  

i'm not comfortable with the reasoning that a proposal
is not right because the superintendents of the wg
might interpret it the wrong way and come up with
some funny ideas. i think it would be more customary 
for the wg to decide what it would like to do
(within the context of its charter) while assuming
that the wg superintendents are reasonable.

it seems that the potential problem you mention is 
perhaps more a communication issue than a technical 
one.

c u
fsb

_______________________________________________
pwot mailing list
pwot@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot