Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com> Wed, 28 February 2001 14:36 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA07306 for <pwot-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:36:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA23151; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:26:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA23123 for <pwot@ns.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:26:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA07024 for <pwot@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:26:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from erosen-sun.cisco.com (erosen-sun.cisco.com [161.44.134.50]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA24590; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:25:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (erosen@localhost) by erosen-sun.cisco.com (8.8.4-Cisco.1/CISCO.WS.1.2) with ESMTP id JAA27807; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:25:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200102281425.JAA27807@erosen-sun.cisco.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: erosen-sun.cisco.com: erosen owned process doing -bs
To: tom worster <tom@ennovatenetworks.com>
cc: "PWOT Email List (E-mail)" <pwot@ietf.org>, "CEOT Email List (E-mail)" <ceot@laurelnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:37:33 -0500. <00ba01c0a0db$95e74ea0$7203010a@ennovatenetworks.com>
Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com
User-Agent: EMH/1.10.0 WEMI/1.13.2 (Mochimune) FLIM/1.12.1 (Nishinokyō) Emacs/20.6 (sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by WEMI 1.13.2 - "Mochimune")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:25:10 -0500
From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
Sender: pwot-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwot-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <pwot.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pwot@ietf.org
> 1) is an mpls lsp an example of a "pseudo-wire?" > 2) can ip be regarded as "transport?" I'm not sure this is the right approach. If we follow this out, those brainiacs in the IESG are likely to tell us that the MPLS LSP has to be carried as a VC in something like draft-martini-l2circuit-encap-mpls-01. _______________________________________________ pwot mailing list pwot@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot
- [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Dan Tappan
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Alan Hannan
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Alan Hannan
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom k. johnson
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Eric Rosen
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Sasha Vainshtein
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster