RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
"tom k. johnson" <tom_johnson@litchfieldcomm.com> Wed, 28 February 2001 00:15 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA06520 for <pwot-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA05263; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:11:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA05231 for <pwot@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:11:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from WATERTOWN.litchfieldcomm.com (121.125.252.64.snet.net [64.252.125.121]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA06388 for <pwot@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:11:33 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:12:13 -0500
Message-ID: <0E2DFCE7E586904DA0F583CB5EAD73CC03046D@WATERTOWN.litchfieldcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thread-Topic: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
Thread-Index: AcChGxorAi+2g4RHQsiWHPkXX9DuTA==
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
From: "tom k. johnson" <tom_johnson@litchfieldcomm.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
To: tom worster <tom@ennovatenetworks.com>, "PWOT Email List (E-mail)" <pwot@ietf.org>, "CEOT Email List (E-mail)" <ceot@laurelnetworks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id TAA05232
Sender: pwot-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwot-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <pwot.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pwot@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Tom. Another point to be considered... The work by Martini and Malis in PWOT defines methods for mapping Frame Relay, ATM, and TDM into MPLS. Currently, MPLS can only be carried over ATM, POS, and the like. Perhaps your draft could be used to extend these adaptation functions to operate over IP networks as well. -Tom -----Original Message----- From: pwot-admin@ietf.org [mailto:pwot-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of tom worster Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: PWOT Email List (E-mail); CEOT Email List (E-mail) Subject: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip i'd like to ask the to-be-working group three questions relating to this draft (it should show in the repository soon, a url is given below): 1) is an mpls lsp an example of a "pseudo-wire?" 2) can ip be regarded as "transport?" 3) should mpls-in-ip be a standards track work item for pwot? in which the terms pseudo-wire and transport express the scope of the wg. my opinions are. 1) yes. if an atm connection, frame relay connection, ds1 or oc3 are considered pseudo-wires then i think an mpls lsp can reasonably be considered a pseudo-wire. 2) yes. the usage of "transport" in the pwot group seems to be more general than other uses. if mpls (which is a sub-ip protocol) is a transport protocol along side tcp, udp, rtp (which are all super-ip), etc., then i don't see why ip can't also be regarded as providing transport. 3) if i'm right on the above two points then i think pwot would the right place to write a standard encapsulation of mpls in ip, should the ietf want such as standard. http://thefsb.org/draft-worster-mpls-in-ip-03.txt c u fsb _______________________________________________ pwot mailing list pwot@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot _______________________________________________ pwot mailing list pwot@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot
- [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Dan Tappan
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Alan Hannan
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Alan Hannan
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom k. johnson
- Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Eric Rosen
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip Sasha Vainshtein
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster
- RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip tom worster