[Qirg] Cambridge Quantum Network
Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Wed, 27 November 2019 09:50 UTC
Return-Path: <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AD4120832 for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 01:50:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sfc.wide.ad.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVFS3zbabs5y for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 01:50:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3BD120821 for <qirg@irtf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 01:50:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vanmetedneysmbp.fletsphone (3.193.13.160.dy.iij4u.or.jp [160.13.193.3]) (Authenticated sender: rdv) by mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17CA617E0; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:50:21 +0900 (JST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sfc.wide.ad.jp; s=mail1; t=1574848221; bh=5wtEK0839ZnUlbemWSIMMYxCWH4RngbM7FNVJrsE08g=; h=From:Subject:Date:Cc:To:From; b=nmPqURE0x7enuYXmJkOxgZ01Ze4L7w2REv74yDAruawRPurYAn8IeRJxpImpJMGnQ 7izYdDPkoa98szlM2+j7haVH2PrUMKJbcK/p63Dnm2uuY5HCdRtk6liZQQB7c70Teq QpPkdYO0d3xbrq6ste4leQJcVPbeyyPATa8mKAyipVvqcuX5C0GnmoIErBt5+uwhmV iegkWkLKVg8ZkmOIuutj4M8yeMwWXdV5Dbt5xKU5QPgIitaruy4c6un/PjwlgDZErw v+sL1mPvmlvY8Nd7ZROayIwomGkTJDhDNslBBPtEVX1CowRPSrnwv76o5e3O8Oag4T H1idDZYuMmbbQ==
From: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D029AC53-C8CB-4094-B69D-21FD501E539F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Message-Id: <CE4F71BC-8CDA-438A-9EC1-E8DA76607FCC@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:50:19 +0900
Cc: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/0w-Fx9XvGaQEklJEHqbOtSmJFLY>
Subject: [Qirg] Cambridge Quantum Network
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:50:25 -0000
All single-photon QKD, as far as I can tell in a two-minute look; the only mentions of repeaters is in references about when QKD networks are better than repeaters and when they are worse. Searching for “application” brings up a bunch of instances, but if they have already integrated it into either TLS or IPsec I don’t see it. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-019-0221-4 <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-019-0221-4> —Rod Rodney Van Meter Professor, Faculty of Environment and Information Studies Keio University, Japan rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp
- [Qirg] Cambridge Quantum Network Rodney Van Meter