IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Qirg] multiplexing?

Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 27 April 2021 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB8B3A1815 for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sfc.wide.ad.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRWqUH-1eGLT for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16863A1812 for <qirg@irtf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.2] (softbank126077194248.bbtec.net [126.77.194.248]) (Authenticated sender: rdv) by mail1.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F183417A; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:35:24 +0900 (JST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sfc.wide.ad.jp; s=mail1; t=1619508924; bh=rCybDH0TZzEkpO+z8wyeuxbvJrFkNgPBUIXCbPVnAeQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:Cc:To:From; b=hAoIw9dCWT97zsWN3K+CkhtNaYNyOwGQGE9UTIFPSOeaHi2esgy75UvDdUxqpMsau +tuFFTEep6zsbd1I+wCCBr9hQ5bDrx1hZQCl1vHX95Z9g5F9sb39gFwXpCbA3RwMOh JuajQayYntd2N42A1AdWnbV3LYVqVZOVNaTSs5hOOfinRzxkNbKO3Bps4osClNavZZ eM4ZqT76VxcBe/2OaFykbOoqoCww1SJXBBFvCOgzoczztXYM7yKR6y4a6evT7nRELx JEdAHVT4SlKIIAmrRActdKdh0/3kf7iJFn01jtaHw8Sb3CWEyvI8C0FGQ/GNTUJdaD 6a7K6eXqXJ/zQ==
From: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <05E19233-CE34-487B-BB1B-F37577F0954A@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:35:23 +0900
Cc: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/1UBxD6JmGNZMgXgs_axgBnI0SRI>
Subject: [Qirg] multiplexing?
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Quantum Internet RG <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:35:38 -0000

Wojtek,

Just dinking around I noticed that we never use the word “multiplexing” in our I-D.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-qirg-principles/
We do refer to “resource management”.

QIRGers, what do y’all think?  Should we use muxing in some form in this to discuss the problem of managing access to resources along the path?

—Rod

P.S. Yes, we said in IETF a few weeks ago that this would be sent to IRSG by now, but we haven’t gotten it sent. I do think it’s ready.

Rodney Van Meter
rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp
Professor, Faculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University, Japan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email