Re: [Qirg] comments on the architecture draft

Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl> Mon, 09 March 2020 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9649F3A0AB1 for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B89evuEDHhSw for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl (mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403563A0AAF for <Qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavis (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528FF2400A8; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:01:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tudelft.nl
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl ([130.161.131.71]) by localhost (tudelft.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MkaEz6VgRCHy; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:01:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SRV216.tudelft.net (mailboxcluster.tudelft.net [131.180.6.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2572400AA; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SRV220.tudelft.net (131.180.6.20) by SRV216.tudelft.net (131.180.6.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:01:23 +0100
Received: from SRV220.tudelft.net ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210]) by SRV220.tudelft.net ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:01:23 +0100
From: Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
To: "rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp" <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
CC: "Qirg@irtf.org" <Qirg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: comments on the architecture draft
Thread-Index: AQHV80y0BmVa9mhvxUukMXtdjHnk56g/60CA
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:01:23 +0000
Message-ID: <d78589416caf7394fa80231447e07cb210c55dcc.camel@tudelft.nl>
References: <d755e4fc670c04bffdf1c6b61f060d2c4e26d7dd.camel@tudelft.nl> <0FB02454-AAE3-4084-BBD9-473FE552906F@gmail.com> <0ee348aa0d8f20ae53bc9db5d16de526d7539694.camel@tudelft.nl> <F31F189F-03E4-4272-9E60-7C61BDAE0C44@gmail.com> <924A1C97-8663-4073-BA10-D9FA957B3FA0@gmail.com> <495965f6486d1e781d1c931c0b6fac2e28da2af6.camel@tudelft.nl> <8BC7AA89-6A90-455E-946C-885B2C881D30@gmail.com> <01C35282-9EBC-433D-A233-711D733904A9@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <01C35282-9EBC-433D-A233-711D733904A9@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Accept-Language: en-GB, nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <179DDCF67C58BC459B1AAB368436D401@forest.intra>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/V83bCF-5afOBLjuVCZM9zbEQRi8>
Subject: Re: [Qirg] comments on the architecture draft
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:01:36 -0000

> Put these on your TODO list, and maybe we can find time to work on them
> together F2F sometime during the week in Vancouver?
> 

Sure, sounds good to me. Perhaps, we can have a side meeting to address the
draft as a whole. If time allows this could be just an extension to the one I
already scheduled or we might need another one.