[Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key Distribution be Used for Secure Communications ?
Gelard Patrick <Patrick.Gelard@cnes.fr> Fri, 05 June 2020 06:30 UTC
Return-Path: <Patrick.Gelard@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669C3A12E5 for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gS8w9QoGyzP for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.cnes.fr (mx2.cnes.fr [194.199.174.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9143A12E6 for <qirg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.73,475,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="35431766"
X-IPAS-Result: A2EuBgB05dle/wYBeAo9BQEBIh0BAQEBCQESAQUFAUAHgUMCgSGBYxSBPaV5gxKGKoFoCwEBAQEBAQEBARsUCAQBAYREAoIvJTkFDQIQAQEBBQEBAQEBBgIBAQIChkQBC4Z7XgEMCRVWJgEEG4MfgX6BDbIPgTQahDcPhhgGgTiBZY0BgVSCH4NTAQOBKTyDRYItBI56iTabRQeBTIEQgnyOH4gBgQWPbgONRpB3oByBeDMaJ4M2TxcCkQWEeIkYgQEqAgYIAQEDCY5ngRABAQ
X-URL-LookUp-ScanningError: 1
From: Gelard Patrick <Patrick.Gelard@cnes.fr>
To: "qirg@irtf.org" <qirg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [For information] Should Quantum Key Distribution be Used for Secure Communications ?
Thread-Index: AdY7AoTZABaNMUZnTXS45D2Chtb7HQ==
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:30:26 +0000
Message-ID: <F1E8EFF81FCF1B46AA7CCA3CC4D5E18CA05F0635@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.100.1062-25462.005
x-tm-as-result: No--12.010600-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F1E8EFF81FCF1B46AA7CCA3CC4D5E18CA05F0635TWMBXP03cnesnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/XaT-8XZ4Q51cBr5buhtJf6yuMxU>
Subject: [Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key Distribution be Used for Secure Communications ?
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:30:35 -0000
Dear all, A critical analysis of the QKD service : https://www.ssi.gouv.fr/en/publication/should-quantum-key-distribution-be-used-for-secure-communications/ Best regards Patrick
- [Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key Distr… Gelard Patrick
- Re: [Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key D… Bruno Rijsman
- Re: [Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key D… Gelard Patrick
- Re: [Qirg] [For information] Should Quantum Key D… VAN DEN BOSSCHE Mathias